TEARDOWN 59 · REVIEWED 2026-08-18

LinkResearchTools

LinkResearchTools (LRT) is a backlink-analysis and disavow-management suite built around Link Detox, its toxic-link scoring and disavow-file tool. It gets backlink data by combining 25+ third-party data sources with its own web crawlers, rather than running one proprietary web-scale index.

API STITCHCAN YOU BUILD IT YOURSELF?No — not the backlink data
$599+/MOCONFIDENCE MEDIUM3 PARTS

No — LinkResearchTools combines backlink data from 25+ undisclosed third-party sources plus its own crawlers, and layers real, rebuildable engineering (Link Detox's toxicity scoring and disavow workflow) on top of that borrowed data rather than running a moat of its own.

25+ DATA SOURCESOWN CRAWLERS FOR VERIFICATIONPROPRIETARY LINK DETOX SCORING

What you lose building it yourself

  • A single dashboard combining 25+ backlink data feeds instead of subscribing to each separately
  • Link Detox's toxic-link scoring and auto-generated disavow files
  • Historical link-monitoring and campaign tracking across every target domain

Why people still pay

The DIY version only ever sees links Google Search Console already shows you for your own site — LRT's value is the breadth of its combined data sources plus a disavow workflow that's already built, tested, and campaign-tracked.

BUILD YOUR OWN · PARTIAL (SCORING + DISAVOW WORKFLOW)

Scoring your own known backlinks for toxicity and generating a disavow file is a real, buildable weekend project once you already have backlink data in hand. Getting backlink data as broad as LRT's 25+ combined sources is the part that isn't a coding problem — that means subscribing to the same kind of third-party data providers LRT itself pulls from.

StackGoogle Search Console API for your own site's known backlinks · a simple rules-based scorer (spammy anchor patterns, low-authority TLDs, link-network fingerprints) for toxicity flags · a script that writes a plain-text disavow file in Google's required format.

Prompt
Build a Python script that: (1) pulls the list of linking sites for a domain from the Google Search Console API's Links report, (2) flags any linking domain matching a supplied blocklist of spammy TLDs or exceeding a set count of outbound links per page (a rough spam signal), (3) writes the flagged domains to a plain-text disavow file in Google's required format (`domain:example.com` per line), and (4) outputs a CSV of every link reviewed with a flagged/not-flagged column for manual sign-off before uploading. Cap the run at 2,000 linking domains per execution.
Out of scope: discovering backlinks Google Search Console doesn't show you (that requires a paid, broad-coverage backlink index — the 25+ sources LRT combines) and any AI-scored toxicity model — this script uses simple rule-based heuristics, not the tuned scoring LRT sells.
0 built so far

Similar tools

Free alternative: Google Search ConsoleSearch Console's own Links report and disavow tool cover toxic-link review and disavowal for free, for sites you own — LRT's edge is combining 25+ third-party data sources for broader (and competitor) backlink visibility Search Console can't show you.

Vendor's own claim

"LinkResearchTools combines link data from 25+ link data sources to give you a complete link profile analysis. We then clean, re-crawls and verify the link data for you."

https://www.linkresearchtools.com/pricing/ · RETRIEVED 2026-08-18

Verified 2026-08-18Spot something wrong? →

QUESTIONS

Does LinkResearchTools disclose which backlink databases make up its "25+ data sources"?

No — LinkResearchTools' own pricing and about pages state it combines "25+ Data Sources + LRT Web Crawlers" but don't name the individual partners or say what share of the data each contributes.

Is there a free trial?

A 7-day trial of the Superhero Small plan costs $17, then rolls automatically into the full $599/month rate — not a no-cost trial.

What exactly is Link Detox?

LRT's toxic-link identification and disavow tool: it scores a site's backlinks for risk and generates the disavow file Google requires, rather than requiring that file to be built by hand.